Kolorblind Sneaker Consignment Shop Responds To Backlash On Reddit Over Alleged Fake Yeezys October 25, 2016 BY Sneaker News Last night we ran a story from reddit about a customer who claimed to have purchased counterfeit Yeezy Boost 350 shoes from sneaker consignment shop kolorblind in San Diego. The customer, Redditor intensetrash26, claims to have purchased counterfeits and was not offered a full refund. The consignment shop went on delete a photo they had posted of the customer while blocking him as well as deleting comments made by others in support. kolorblind reached out to us for their side of the story; the customer purchased the shoes brand new on September 11th, 2016 and 38 days later, called the store claiming the shoes were counterfeit. The shop owner responded immediately and invited him to the store on Monday to get things sorted out. After inspecting the shoes, kolorblind offered $1,000 in store credit. The shoes had been worn since they were initially purchased and the customer attempted to clean them with a sneaker cleaning product.

The customer rejected the store credit offer, but the question remains – are the shoes counterfeit and if so, how did it end up at a sneaker consignment shop? Now that both sides of the story have been presented, what are your thoughts? Read their statement to us below. On September 11, 2016, Mathias came into Kolorblind Shoes with his mother and purchased a Brand New DeadStock 100% Authentic Adidas Yeezy Boost 350 Turtle Dove for $1,728 after taxes.nike running shoes summer 2014 38 Days later (October 19th), he calls up the store and says, “I just had the Yeezy’s legit checked and they came back false.” top rated walking shoes 2015I replied with, “let me give you my personal number and we will get this straightened out asap.” cheap prom dresses in uk

Later that day I called and told him to stop by on Monday with the shoes so we can start the process. When he arrived at the store today, he presented the shoes and I knew then, something else was going on. The shoes have been worn numerous times and appeared to have some substance dropped on them that he ineffectively tried to clean ruining the uppers of the shoes. As the Store Manager for the last 2+ years and an avid sneaker enthusiast for the past 14+ years, this was not the same shoe we sold him 38 Days earlier.nike high tops price in india Our first goal as a business is customer satisfaction. best shoes for walking all day in parisIn this impossible situation, we decided to offer a store credit of $1,000 and just eat the loss, for which they declined. best womens golf shoes for flat feet

After we declined to refund at that point, they started to get upset. We get it though, everyone is looking for a come up at someone else’s expense, we just decided not to lay down this time and take it. This bait and switch routine happens all the time and as the business, we never get a fair shake. We are here for the people, to help them get done what they don’t have time for, nothing more. .00 0 bids0hr 36mins .00 BUY IT NOW0hr 53mins .00 14 bids1hr 5mins .00 14 bids1hr 18mins .00 16 bids1hr 26mins i Adidas Adidas Yeezy i adidas Yeezy adidas Yeezy Boost 350 YeezyR5m worth of fake Nike and Guess shoes seized Police confiscated the counterfeit goods and all manufacturing equipment at the Mobeni factory. Fake Nike and Guess branded items worth R5 million were seized after a joint police operation shut down a Mobeni factory, in the south of Durban, on Thursday, reports the Southlands Sun . ALSO READ: Suspected ATM robbers crash into Port Shepstone police vehicle

Members of the Hawks counterfeit team, ORS Durban Harbour anti-smuggling unit and border security crime intelligence, made the discovery of the counterfeit factory that was manufacturing the fake products. Among the counterfeit branded items were sandals and shoes. A Nike protection manager was on scene to identify the label’s brand. Police confiscated the counterfeit goods and all manufacturing equipment. “The owner of the company will be summoned to appear in the Durban specialised commercial court to face charges of contravention of the Counterfeit Goods Act 37 of 1997,” said Hawks spokesperson Captain Simphiwe Mhlongo. ALSO READ: Three-metre croc chases canoeist – Caxton News Service Shoes Having a good pair of shoes will help you put your best foot forward. And with Walmart's great selection and Every Day Low Prices, it's easy to find a perfect pair. If you're buying shoes for a formal party or special occasion, check out our men's dress shoes or women's pumps.

For everyday professional wear, women's flats offer a comfortable, stylish alternative to heels. Athletic shoes are a terrific option for everyday casual wear as well as for the gym. And don't forget to pick up a pair of sandals for the summer and boots for the winter. For the little ones, you'll find kids' shoes that are just as high quality and fashionable as adult shoes, including sneakers, boots and sandals with your kids' favorite characters. We even carry baby and toddler shoes and booties.Shouldn't The Patent Office Be Able To Reject... >> << US Looking To Use Computer Hacking Law Against... Thu, Dec 16th 2010 10:20am sneakers, suing customers, trademark, trainers, uk Nike Sues Guy Who Ordered Single Pair Of Counterfeit Sneakers Over The Internet from the nike-picks-up-the-RIAA-strategy dept Warning: you might not want to ever buy Nike shoes again. If you i buy a counterfeit pair of shoes, Nike might sue you. Via Glyn Moody, we learn that Nike chose to sue a guy who ordered a single pair of trainers online, believing they were legitimate Nike shoes.

The shoes were seized at the UK border as counterfeits. Nike could have gone after the actual counterfeiters. Or it could have (perhaps more questionably) gone after some other third parties, such as the retailers who sold the shoes. Instead, it chose option 3 and sued the buyers directly. Most of the suits were settled (or, apparently, ignored). However, one customer, a Mr. E. Bateman, thought this was ridiculous, and fought it. He pointed out that he simply thought he was buying legitimate Nikes, and it seems rather ridiculous to then be sued for it. The judge noted that, under UK trademark law, the buyer's intent is absolutely meaningless: "Whether or not the defendant believed the goods were authentic is irrelevant to the question of trade mark infringement. Whether the goods are infringing goods or counterfeit goods is an objective question. The Defendant's state of mind does not matter. Equally the Defendant's state of mind is irrelavant to the question of importation."

In other words, don't ever buy Nike shoes, or you might get sued. Of course, all this makes you wonder: what the hell was Nike thinking? We've seen how suing customers backfired badly for the RIAA and others, but this goes even beyond that. Here's a case where a guy appeared to believe he had just bought legitimate shoes, and Nike's response is to sue him, take him to court, and then win its lawsuit against him. The judge did point out that he "questioned whether the sledge hammer of these proceedings is necessary in order to crack this nut of this magnitude," and even then Nike pushed forward, claiming that the companies has "no realistic alternative to enforcing their rights this way."Sure they do: the alternative is not suing their customer. That said, at least the judge did not make Mr. Bateman pay any fine or award to Nike (even though Nike did ask for money), but rather, he has to promise not to infringe in the future, allow the shoes (still held by UK customs) to be destroyed and provide the details of where he bought the shoes.